Stat |
Rank |
Date |
Comment |
|
1/60 |
02-03-15 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/41 |
06-30-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/48 |
06-14-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/45 |
01-27-09 |
Forgot that I got this with my 1:45:95 time!! :D |
|
1/51 |
05-29-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/34 |
12-23-07 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
07-24-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/38 |
03-25-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/45 |
02-11-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/41 |
07-21-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/48 |
06-26-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/35 |
01-13-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
08-17-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/37 |
03-29-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/46 |
03-13-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/42 |
08-25-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/49 |
07-11-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/36 |
01-18-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
08-17-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/39 |
04-05-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/46 |
03-26-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/42 |
08-25-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/49 |
07-12-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/36 |
01-20-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
09-03-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/40 |
04-07-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/46 |
03-29-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/43 |
08-29-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/48 |
07-15-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/37 |
01-21-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/58 |
11-30-13 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/39 |
04-23-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/47 |
04-25-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/44 |
11-09-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/49 |
07-30-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/37 |
03-08-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/60 |
10-21-14 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/40 |
05-04-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/47 |
05-19-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/45 |
12-08-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/50 |
01-19-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/37 |
03-21-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/47 |
05-27-09 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/45 |
01-25-09 |
Forgot that I got this with my 1:45:95 time!! :D |
|
1/50 |
04-20-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/35 |
12-20-07 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
07-12-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
2/63 |
10-07-18 |
|
|
3/35 |
12-20-07 |
This was really fun, I wanna do it again!! |
|
7/34 |
09-03-07 |
Got it with my 2:22:40. |
|
7/34 |
10-24-07 |
Got it with my 2:06:58!! |